A alocação de riscos para as partes à luz da teoria do design contratual
Keywords:
Contractual Design , Risk Allocation , Incomplete Contracts , Vague Terms , Game Theory , Asymmetric Information , Renegotiation , COVID-19Abstract
The contemporary concept of contract comes from the 1980s: a contract shall be understood as a social product and shall be interpreted within society’s context. The contract, from the end of the 20th century, reveals itself as a support for the economic operation. In this sense, the contract starts to act as a future conduct program and brings, among other characteristics, an asymmetry of information between the parties and risks and uncertainties about its object. Facing the contract as an instrument of a financial transaction, some questions show up: which party should absorb the existing risks? Is it possible to predict all variables? What mechanisms exist to foresee and strategically distribute risks to the parties? The theory of contractual design is granted to contract parties as a possibility of strategically anticipating risks and results of a possible legal dispute. According to this theory, besides the contract being an artifact of economy and circulation of goods, it is an adequate instrument to anticipate or postpone conflicts between the parties. Without any claim to covering this topic exhaustively, this work aims to trace lines of the theory of contract design and its influences on the allocation of risks to parties, bringing to discussion the economic legal issues that are present in everyday life of every contractual lawyer, analyzing it in the light of this contemporary contractual theory. Last, but not least, due to the major attention it deserves, an analytical study of the current legal scenario put by COVID-19 in face of the allocated risks at the front-end in the contractual instruments and the following gap brought up by this pandemic to the incomplete contracts.